Talk:Vagina
From Wikiality
uh oh, what if i get a job and see this at work? doggies 06:25, 7 August 2006 (PDT)
oh noez, its not safe for work at all!!!!, youd better just not get a job.Sultangris 06:39, 7 August 2006 (PDT)
you really should put this pic in there Image:Teen-pussy-pic2.jpg as its completly relevent.-Sultangris212.112.241.159 13:08, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
- We're working on a non-pornographic image. Go away.
--Paranoia 13:10, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
Why would you put a nonpornographic imag under Vagina? and wtf is your problem with the porno? i say as long as its relevant keep it, once again, this is not wikipedia so theres no reason to be so uptight, and u have no good reason or right to ban me.-sultangris- 212.112.241.159 13:14, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
ya know this article was never funny and the only good thing was the pic you fags insist on deleting cause it may ormay not be porn, which i say it was not in fact porn.--131.155.71.110 13:35, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
- The picture is not going up. End of story. We will have something else, soon. --Paranoia 13:38, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
- I was thinking, and I'm going to have to look around to find it, but there is a peice of artwork that is (rather famously) known to be a flower that suggests a vagina, without actually being one. That would probably work well; I'm just going to have to wait until after work to find it, lest I stumble across a few NSFW images and piss off the boss. ComebackShane 13:49, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
- I added the picture from The Wonder Years where the coach tries to draw the female reproductive system. It is less pornographic and more funnier. I didn't feel it was my place to take down the other pic because it sort of fits in with the artical. --Fuzzy 1659CST, 15AUG06
- I definitely like that better; there is humor in subtlety. ComebackShane 15:09, 16 August 2006 (PDT)
- I added the picture from The Wonder Years where the coach tries to draw the female reproductive system. It is less pornographic and more funnier. I didn't feel it was my place to take down the other pic because it sort of fits in with the artical. --Fuzzy 1659CST, 15AUG06
- I was thinking, and I'm going to have to look around to find it, but there is a peice of artwork that is (rather famously) known to be a flower that suggests a vagina, without actually being one. That would probably work well; I'm just going to have to wait until after work to find it, lest I stumble across a few NSFW images and piss off the boss. ComebackShane 13:49, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
[edit] Db?
I don't so much have a problem with the topic of the article, so much as the content. Specifically, it being not funny. That's what makes me want to delete it. Thoughts? ComebackShane 12:39, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
- Leave it be --Fuzzy 1659CST, 15AUG06
- I like it and think it has a lot of potential. What concerns me is how much is wikiality. A lot of it seems like something off uncyclopedia and some seems more like the intent is to insult Colbert's interests, like D&D. Of course, if Colbert can be quoted as saying any of it or something related, it stays. Otherwise, it needs nailing.--Pro-Lick 20:52, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
